<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Review: Safari 4 Beta for Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.graphicrating.com/2009/02/24/browser-review-safari-4-beta-for-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.graphicrating.com/2009/02/24/browser-review-safari-4-beta-for-windows/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunmi</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicrating.com/2009/02/24/browser-review-safari-4-beta-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicrating.com/?p=2081#comment-502</guid>
		<description>i really love the layout of Safari 4. the graphics of this browser looks much better than firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i really love the layout of Safari 4. the graphics of this browser looks much better than firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melatoninplus</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicrating.com/2009/02/24/browser-review-safari-4-beta-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>melatoninplus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicrating.com/?p=2081#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Safari 4 is a bit slow compared to either Opera and Firefox. but i like the interface and graphics of Safari 4, it is cool though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Safari 4 is a bit slow compared to either Opera and Firefox. but i like the interface and graphics of Safari 4, it is cool though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khim</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicrating.com/2009/02/24/browser-review-safari-4-beta-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Khim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicrating.com/?p=2081#comment-500</guid>
		<description>i like the design of Safari 4 but i think it uses more resources compared to Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the design of Safari 4 but i think it uses more resources compared to Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: detoxdiet</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicrating.com/2009/02/24/browser-review-safari-4-beta-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>detoxdiet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicrating.com/?p=2081#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Apple Safari takes more resources compared to Opera and Firefox. sometimes it also freezes so i would still stick to Opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple Safari takes more resources compared to Opera and Firefox. sometimes it also freezes so i would still stick to Opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Opera 10 Is Better Than Safari 4 — LucaFiligheddu.com</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicrating.com/2009/02/24/browser-review-safari-4-beta-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Opera 10 Is Better Than Safari 4 — LucaFiligheddu.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicrating.com/?p=2081#comment-493</guid>
		<description>[...] Browser Review: Safari 4 Beta for Windows (graphicrating.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Browser Review: Safari 4 Beta for Windows (graphicrating.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Gongea</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicrating.com/2009/02/24/browser-review-safari-4-beta-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Gongea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicrating.com/?p=2081#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Cover Flow is nice. The thing that I like most is the performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cover Flow is nice. The thing that I like most is the performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hines</title>
		<link>http://www.graphicrating.com/2009/02/24/browser-review-safari-4-beta-for-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.graphicrating.com/?p=2081#comment-491</guid>
		<description>Although claimed by Apple as fastest browser, I dont think its qiute that fast! I have used many other browsers and feel that google crome is the fastest of them all. By the way they have added new features such as &quot;cover flow&quot; which I like very much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although claimed by Apple as fastest browser, I dont think its qiute that fast! I have used many other browsers and feel that google crome is the fastest of them all. By the way they have added new features such as &#8220;cover flow&#8221; which I like very much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
